Definition of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
On July 30,
2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was signed into law by
President George W. Bush. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was named so because it was
introduced by Senator Paul S. Sarbanes and House Representative Michael G.
Oxley.
This Act was
intended to improve financial reporting practices. The SOX provisions, however,
apply only to public companies and public accounting firms that
audit financial statements of public companies.
#
|
Title | Some Provisions |
I
|
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) | Establishes PCAOB. Outlines PCAOB responsibilities. |
II
|
Auditor Independence | Dictates auditor independence standards, including:
|
III
|
Corporate Responsibility | Establishes responsibilities of public company audit committees. Establishes corporate responsibility for financial reports. Establishes officer and director bars and penalties. Prohibits improper influence on conduct of audits. Prohibits insider trading during pension fund black-out periods. |
IV
|
Enhanced Financial Disclosures | Enhances financial disclosure requirements, including:
|
V
|
Analyst Conflicts of Interest | Discusses the treatment of securities analysts by registered securities associations and national securities exchanges. |
VI
|
Commission Resources and Authority | Outlines resources and authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). |
VII
|
Studies and Reports | Discusses such studies as:
|
VIII
|
Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability | Establishes such provisions as:
|
IX
|
While-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements | Discusses increased penalties for while-collar crimes, including:
|
X
|
Corporate Tax Returns | Requires corporate tax returns to be signed by the chief executive offer (CEO). |
XI
|
Corporate Fraud and Accountability | Establishes enhanced regulation of general corporate fraud,
including:
|
SOX provision examples – part one
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB): the SOX Act establishes PCAOB, an independent board with standard setting and disciplinary authority. The Board consists of five (5) members: two (2) CPAs and three (3) non-CPAs.
Auditor Independence: the Act addresses auditor independence-related issues. It prohibits auditors of public companies from performing contemporaneously (i.e., at the same time) such non-audit services as:- Actuarial
- Appraisal and valuation
- Bookkeeping
- Expert and legal services unrelated to the audit
- Financial information system design and implementation
- Human resources function
- Internal audit outsourcing
- Investment banking and advising by a broker/dealer
- Management function
Corporate Responsibility: in accordance with the Act, in order to be listed on national securities exchanges (e.g., NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ) and national securities associations, public companies are required to comply with audit committee requirements, which include the following:
- Each member of the audit committee of the public company must be independent.
- The audit committee must be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the public accounting firm performing the audit. The auditors must directly report to the audit committee.
- The audit committee must establish procedures for receiving and processing complaints regarding auditing matters, including accounting and internal controls.
- The audit committee must have the authority to engage independent counsel.
- The public company must fund the audit committee.
If a public company doesn’t have an audit committee, the board of directors can perform the function of an audit committee, provided the board meets all the requirements. Also, the Act has some exemptions from the audit committee requirement: parent-subsidiary, multiple listing, IPO, and foreign private issuer (e.g., foreign government, board of auditors, shareholder representative, and non-management employee).
The Act prohibits directors and officers and any person acting under the direction of an officer or director to influence the auditor though coercion, manipulation, misleading actions, or fraud - if that person knew or should have known that such actions could make the financial statements materially misleading. An individual can be considered a director or officer regardless of his or her title: it depends on the function of the individual in the organization.
SOX provision examples – part two
Enhanced
Financial Disclosure: in accordance with the SOX Section 404, company’s
management must create and maintain adequate internal controls over financial
reporting and must present its assessment of the internal controls. Annual
reports filed with the SEC must be accompanied by the management’s statement
regarding the effectiveness of the internal controls. The company’s auditor
must also attest to the management’s assessment of the company’s internal
controls.
- Financial condition
- Change in financial condition
- Results of operations
- Liquidity
- Capital expenditures
- Capital resources
- Significant components of revenues or expenses
Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability: the Act requires auditors to retain audit and review records for seven (7) years after the completion of the audit or review of financial statements. Auditors must retain records that contain financial data, analysis, opinions, and conclusions that are related to audit or review as well as records sent or received in connection with the audit or review.
The Act establishes significant fines and penalties for corporate and criminal fraud. For instance, a failure by an auditor to properly maintain audit and review workpapers for at least five (5) years from the end of the fiscal year the audit or review was performed could result in fines and/or imprisonment of ten (10) years, or less. In accordance with the Act, "whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence" federal investigation or bankruptcy could face significant fines and/or imprisonment of not more than 20 years.
White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancements: according to the Act, mail fraud, wire fraud, or false (willful) certification of financial reports could be punished with a fine of no more than $5 million or the imprisonment of up to 20 years, or both.
Corporate Fraud and Accountability: the Act gives the Securities and Exchange Commission a right to prohibit persons from serving as officers or directors of public companies that are registered pursuant to section 12 or that file reports pursuant to section 15(d). The Act also establishes increased criminal penalties under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as well as whistleblower protection: retaliation against informants could be punished with a fine or imprisonment of no more than 10 years, or both
No comments:
Post a Comment