Learn about discretionary costs, view examples of such costs,
and understand instances where discretionary costs may be changed to
manage earnings.
1. Definition of discretionary costs
Discretionary costs are expenses that are
important for the business but are subject to management’s judgment
(discretion).
Discretionary
costs are essentially voluntary costs incurred by an entity to
meet customer expectations or create goodwill.
Discretionary
costs are opposite to committed costs – i.e., expenses that an entity
must incur to operate. Usually discretionary costs represent funding for a
specific activity (or project) for a specified period of time.
- Advertising
- Employee training and development
- Employee travel
- Executive retreats
- Repairs and maintenance
- Research and development (R&D)
- Quality control
- Social responsibility
It’s often difficult
to measure the benefits of incurring discretionary costs because
there is usually no clear relationship between cost input and product (service)
output. As the result, when earnings decrease, an entity might cut
discretionary costs first.
To evaluate
output from discretionary costs, an organization could use nonmonetary
measures: some examples are provided in the table below.
Discretionary Cost
|
Nonmonetary Measure of Output
|
Advertising
|
|
Employee training
|
|
Preventive repairs and maintenance
|
|
Quality control
|
|
Social responsibility
|
|
2. Discretionary costs and earnings management
Reduction of
discretionary costs is an example of earnings manipulation through real
activities (i.e., operating, investing, and financing activities). Note,
however, that not every reduction of discretionary costs represents earnings
management.
According to
the research study by Graham et al (Journal of Accounting and Economics,
December 2005), 80% of surveyed CFOs stated that they would decrease
advertising, maintenance, and R&D costs to meet earnings expectations.
Because
discretionary costs are subject to management’s judgment, they can be used to
manage earnings. An organization can decrease its discretionary costs not only
to address financial problems but also to smooth its earnings trend. In the latter
case, the organization would lower the quality of its earnings.
While the
reduction of discretionary costs might seem to be acceptable in the short term,
it can have a negative effect in the long run if the company doesn’t incur costs
necessary for future growth.
To
evaluate any reduction of discretionary costs, one can look at the past
trend in discretionary costs as well as current and future requirements, based
on corporate strategy and market conditions. For instance, to evaluate a trend
in advertising costs, one can look at the relationship between advertising
costs and sales.
Let’s look
at a simple example. Let’s assume that the following information is available
for Tetto Company (a fictitious entity):
20X8
|
20X9
|
20X0
|
20X1
|
20X2
|
|
Sales ($) |
200,000
|
225,000
|
260,000
|
250,000
|
210,000
|
Advertising costs ($) |
21,000
|
27,000
|
31,000
|
30,000
|
20,000
|
As we can
see from the table above, in 20X2 the company decreased its advertising
expenses by $10,000 (or 33%). Let’s assume that the company has been facing a
tougher competition and expects the competition to increase in the next two (2)
years.
To evaluate
the reduction in advertising costs in 20X2, let’s look at the trend in
advertising-to-sales ratio:
20X8
|
20X9
|
20X0
|
20X1
|
20X2
|
|
Sales ($) |
200,000
|
225,000
|
260,000
|
250,000
|
210,000
|
Advertising costs ($) |
21,000
|
27,000
|
31,000
|
30,000
|
20,000
|
Advertising to sales |
10.50%
|
12.00%
|
11.92%
|
12.00%
|
9.52%
|
According to
the table above, in 20X2 the company reduced its advertising costs to a lower
level. However, because the market competition is expected to increase, one
could anticipate that the company should have increased its advertising costs.
Such a reduction of discretionary costs, therefore, might have been used by the
company to smooth its earnings.
No comments:
Post a Comment